Friday, March 1, 2019
Do Animals Need A Bill of Rights? Essay
Animals on a daily basis all over the world ar macrocosm mistr finished and abuse by galore(postnominal) people that do not cargon for them. There are very few people attempting to protect these animals, whether they are domestic animals, farm animals, or wildlife animals. More attention should be drawn to the treatment of animals because even if we do create laws for animals and for their well cosmos, m any(prenominal) people still do not follow these laws. The laws already ceremonious for animals should be enforced, because I do agree that animals need auspices, as in free from any harm done towards them purposely, but to have a Bill of Rights specifically made for animals seems extreme. Reasons for believing that animals need protection from any harm done to them from kind-heartedness is that many animals are being used for scientific experiments that harm these animals in a cruel behavior. Yes, there are experiments that use animals and whitethorn not harm them in any vogue, which is first-rate if theres no harm being done to them. For event in the article A Change of Heart about Animals by Jeremy Rifkin states, In controlled experiments, scientists at Oxford University reported that two birds named Betty and Abel were give inn a filling between using two tools, one a straight wire, the otherwise a hooked wire, to snag a piece of meat from interior a tube. This experiment was fine to conduct because in no way were these crows harmed.The only thing the scientists were doing was observing the crows behavior. If there demand to be experiments done to animals for whatever reason, the experiments should be conducted in a way that the animals are not harmed. Another reason for believing that animals need protection is that animals are being harmed or mistreated by people who have a habit of using animals for entertainment. A form of entertainment for humanity from animals in a cruel way is hunting wildlife animals and killing them or fishing. Li ons, tigers, bears, dears, and cheetahs are ideals of wildlife animals that are hunted and killed for either their meat or fur. look for is also a form of entertainment for sportsmen that catch fish to eat and dont realize the irritation caused to the fish when the sportsmen kill them.For example in the article, Hooked on a Myth by capital of Seychelles Braithwaite states, Every year, sportsmen around the world drag millions of fish to shore on barbed hooks. Its something people have always done, and with little sufficient conscience. This shows how people do not recollect of the harm they are doing to fish. only if because the fish are not crying or yelling with pain does not mean they are not feeling it. We as earth need to think of the animals as living as well. We humans may not understand them, but animals do have feelings and we need to net income more attention to their treatment. Animals are also used for research such as humans closest relatives, which are apes, gor illas, and chimpanzees. There are people who believe since these specific animals are as close in DNA as us that they should be used for research to discovery out how our species function. In the article, Of Primates and Personhood Will According Rights and Dignity to dehumanized Organisms Halt Research? by Ed Yong, Franz de Waal of Emory University, says I do think we have special obligations to the great apes as our closest relatives, but if we give rights to apes, what would be the compelling reason not to give rights to monkeys, dogs, rats, and so on?Apes should not be the only animals receiving rights only because they are our closest relatives. different animals are being used for research and not cared for, why should they adjoin? I believe it is inhumane of us to be so screenland of all the harm being done to all animals scantily for our convenience. In no way do animals benefit from being killed and used as research, we on the other hand utilize them as if they were o bjects. The issue worldwide is that these animals are being mistreated and abused by humans and therefore should be protected from us, but not throw a big decision such as making a Bill of Rights for animals. There are laws already established to protect these animals, and should just be enforced. If these laws are broken by us humans because we should have a punishment, but thats all it should be a law to protect these animals and do no harm to them. We should not go to an extreme and create a Bill of Rights for animals.